Reform The Process Of Negotiating International Treaties

This has been brought up by the process around ACTA / TPP and other free trade negotiations. Such negotiations often happen in secret, and the results can be presented to parliament almost as a fait-accompli. Entering into treaties is one of the remaining Royal Prerogative powers and is regulated by a process under Standing Orders rather than through legislation. (See http://www.mfat.govt.nz/Treaties-and-International-Law/03-Treaty-making-process/index.php).

I'd suggest the following improvements:
- NZ negotiators may not take part in treaty negotiations unless there is agreement for minutes to be published within 30 days of any meeting.
(The exception being where the negotiations concern a current or imminent conflict and the Minister certifies that secrecy is essential to the prospects of coming to an accord. I'm thinking here of something like the East Timor situation).

- The parliamentary process to approve a treaty should be akin to passing a bill.

- A treaty must be reported on by the A-G as to whether it conflicts with BORA. If so, the treaty can only be ratified after a referendum with a supermajority.

- A treaty must be reported on by the A-G as to whether it conflicts with the Treaty of Waitangi. If so, the treaty can only be ratified after a referendum returns a majority amongst both Maori and general electorates.

- A treaty provision which contravenes either BORA or the Treaty of Waitangi (and which has not been approved through referenda as above) can be voided by the courts.

Comments?

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License